78/100
Evidence-agreement score (0–100), not a probability of profitable trading.
How this score is built
Score = (0.55×family agreement + 0.30×coverage + 0.15) × (1 + MTF adjustment) × (1 − conflict penalty). Caps: 78 when daily is neutral vs directional intraday; 88 when MTF is not fully aligned; hard range 5–95. Not a win probability.
Family agreement 60%, coverage 100%, MTF adj +0%, conflict penalty 0%.
Biasneutral
Alignmentconsensus neutral
Market regimeTrending
Aggregated trend strengthStrong
Riskcontained
Multi-timeframe alignment
15m●neutral
1h●neutral
4h●neutral
1D●neutral
All monitored timeframes are neutral. The timeframes agree on the absence of a confirmed directional signal.
Current market assessment
BSBUSDT remains neutral: competing signals keep the assessment balanced.
Daily direction is contradictory: signal stays neutral while RSI sits mid-range (52.5) with ADX at 23.0 — do not treat the daily as a clean trend confirmation.
Trend structure
Price holds below EMA50 on key frames; the short EMA stack backs a bearish structure.
On the primary frame, price holds above both EMA50 and EMA200 — intermediate and longer trend filters agree constructively.
Aggregate ADX-family strength is elevated on the monitored board; treat this as intensity of trend, not as a bullish or bearish direction by itself.
Momentum & oscillators
Momentum oscillators lean supportive of the upside on 4h.
ADX on 4h (40.0) indicates a developed trend — direction still comes from price/EMA, not ADX alone.
Volatility context
Volatility-location signals are balanced without a clear stretch bias.
Risk & invalidation
Extension risk looks contained relative to the current Trending regime (MTF consensus neutral); 4h RSI at 57.9.
Newly aligned multi-timeframe directional evidence — a sustained transition of the monitored board into a clear long or short consensus — would end the neutral aggregate assessment. A clear loss of the intermediate structure that currently keeps readings divided would also change this classification. Do not wait only for a generic range break when the regime is already trending.
Scenario analysis
Base scenario (Trending, MTF consensus neutral): higher-timeframe confirmation is incomplete or directional signals conflict across monitored timeframes — a lean may exist, but multi-timeframe directional agreement is not yet unified. Prefer confirmation over anticipation. This does not describe ADX trend intensity.
Scenarios describe evidence-based paths — not buy/sell recommendations or price targets.
Current assessment FAQ
What would invalidate the current neutral assessment?
Newly aligned multi-timeframe directional evidence — a sustained transition of the monitored board into a clear long or short consensus — would end the neutral aggregate assessment. A clear loss of the intermediate structure that currently keeps readings divided would also change this classification. Do not wait only for a generic range break when the regime is already trending.
Why can two markets share the same timeframe tally but different research?
Board tallies count directional signals only. RSI stretch, ADX strength, EMA200 context and daily contradictions are asset-specific and change the interpretation even when both print the same board tally.
Definitions: RSI and ADX.